Watch out for contradictions in your thesis
Contradictions in master theses, ie contradictions, may indicate low knowledge of the issue as well as the author’s inattention, but if you are dealing with a frequently examined hypothesis, the reason may be completely different.
Certainly, in his study, he had encountered various opinions of experts who were mutually exclusive or contradictory. This is not unusual, especially if there are new or unconfirmed academic dimensions. While researchers do not find a sufficiently scientific methodology to investigate the issue, the hypotheses will vary. A proper scientific approach without enough data cannot exclude one or the other hypothesis just by feeling. Such an approach would not be objective and not scientific at all.
Pay particular attention to various hypotheses if you use fresh literary sources, new periodicals or draw on the Internet.
Be an impartial observer
If you are dealing with a topic that has created several hypotheses in your thesis, try to take an impartial standpoint and present hypotheses as options. Do not cling to one, especially if you use multiple sources from different authors. Just a moment of inattention and a hypothesis that you describe at the beginning of the work starts to collide with the finding of another expert in the core of the diploma.
Check the hypothesis itself
Not everyone has the opportunity to verify a professional hypothesis in practice, but if you have access to technical, laboratory or other equipment, or you can verify some of the hypotheses otherwise, there is a lower risk that individual parts of your work will contradict.
Thanks to our own experiments or measurements, you can incline to some of the mentioned hypotheses in the thesis or to refute another hypothesis. Be careful, however, whether the testing was conducted under the same conditions as the author of the opposed hypothesis, because your results could be easily challenged by the trainer, opponent or commission.
Contradictions may also occur in theoretical works
The biggest problem is contradiction in theoretical works that do not present their own research results and summarize the arguments of other authors. It is in their own case that it is necessary to deprive themselves of the issue and present the claim as one of the alternatives.
SUCCESSIVE HELP: If your master thesis is bifurcated and you risk losing sight of the correctness of the claims or hypotheses, write the main paper hypothesis and check the work according to it. Contradict it to any statement or important fact that you describe in your work. Is there a hypothesis with other facts in conflict?
Use the calm statement, but remember to mention this contradiction and alert the reader to what effect it has on the relevance of the hypothesis itself. With such an approach, not only will your claims not be contradictory, you may discover a completely new argument for “for” or “against” some hypothesis. Originality is also appreciated in defense, and such an approach can help you to better evaluate.